No-fly zone

Read Previous post!
Read Next post!
Reading Time: 4 minutes

hello every one to day will discuss about No-fly zone
This article is about the prevention of flight in a region of airspace by the application or threat of military power. For information on prevention of flight ordinarily enforced by civil regulation or legal means, see Prohibited airspace.
Countries previously subject to no-fly zones- Iraq, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Libya.
A no-fly zone, also known as a no-flight zone (NFZ), or air exclusion zone (AEZ),[1] is a territory or area established by a military power over which certain aircraft are not permitted to fly. Such zones are usually set up in an enemy power’s territory during a conflict, similar in concept to an aerial demilitarized zone, and usually intend to prohibit the country’s military aircraft from operating in the region. Military action is employed by the enforcing state and, depending on the terms of the NFZ, may include preemptive attacks to prevent potential violations, reactive force targeted at violating aircraft, or surveillance with no use of force. Air exclusion zones and anti-aircraft defences are sometimes set up in a civilian context, for example to protect sensitive locations, or events such as the 2012 London Olympic Games, against terrorist air attack.
No-fly zones are a modern phenomenon established in the 1990s. They can be distinguished from traditional air power missions by their coercive appropriation of another nation’s airspace only, to achieve aims on the ground within the target nation. While the RAF conducted prototypical air control operations over various contentious colonies between the two World Wars of the 20th century, no-fly zones did not assume their modern form until the end of the Gulf War in 1991.[2]
During the Cold War, the risk of local conflict escalating into nuclear showdown reduced the attractiveness of military intervention as a tool of U.S. statecraft. Perhaps more importantly, air power was a relatively blunt instrument until the operational maturation of stealth and precision-strike technologies. Before the Gulf War of 1991, air power had not demonstrated the “fidelity” needed to perform nuanced attacks against transitory, difficult-to-reach targets—it lacked the ability to produce decisive political effects short of total war. However, the demise of the Soviet Union and the rise in aerospace capabilities engendered by the technology revolution made no-fly zones viable in both political and military contexts.[2]
Contents []
1Past no-fly zones
1.1Iraq, 1991–2003
1.1.1Legal status
1.1.2Civilian deaths
1.2Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1993–1995
1.3Lessons from Iraq and Bosnia
1.4Libya, 2011
1.5Libya, 2018 and 2019
2See also
Past no-fly zones[edit]
Iraq, 1991–2003[edit]
Main article: Iraqi no-fly zones
Following the 1991 Gulf War, the United States along with other Coalition nations established two no-fly zones in Iraq.[3] U.S. and Coalition officials stated that the northern no-fly zone was intended to prevent attacks against the Kurdish people by the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein, and that the southern no-fly-zone was intended to protect Iraq’s Shia population. On March 16, 1988, the Iraqi Air Force deployed chemical weapons against Kurdish civilians during the Halabja chemical attack, killing 5,000. This air-to-ground event served as part of the motivation used by Coalition Forces in order to extend and expand the NFZs, as well as citing parts of Chapter 42 within the U.N. Charter. The southern no-fly zone originally extended to the 32nd parallel[4] but was extended to the 33rd parallel in 1996.[5]
Legal status[edit]
This military action was not authorised by the United Nations.[6] The Secretary-General of the United Nations at the time the resolution was passed, Boutros Boutros-Ghali called the no-fly zones “illegal” in a February 2003 interview with John Pilger for ZNet.[7][8] In 1998, France withdrew from the operation,[3] with French Foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine saying that “there is no basis in international law for this type of bombing”.[6]
Civilian deaths[edit]
The United Nations reported that in 1999 alone 144 civilians had been killed during Coalition bombing efforts.[9] An internal UN Security Sector report found that, in one five-month period, 41% of the victims were civilians.[10]
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1993–1995[edit]
Main article: Operation Deny Flight
In 1992, the United Nations Security Council passed United Nations Security Council Resolution 781, prohibiting unauthorized military flights in Bosnian airspace. This led to Operation Sky Monitor, where NATO monitored violations of the no-fly zone but did not take action against violators of the resolution. In response to 500 documented violations by 1993,[11] including one combat violation,[12] the Security Council passed Resolution 816, which prohibited all unauthorized flights and allowed all UN member states to “take all necessary measures…to ensure compliance with [the no-fly zone restrictions].”[13] This led to Operation Deny Flight. NATO later launched air strikes during Operation Deny Flight and during Operation Deliberate Force.
Lessons from Iraq and Bosnia[edit]
A 2004 Stanford University paper published in Journal of Strategic Studies, “Lessons from Iraq and Bosnia on the Theory and Practice of No-fly Zones,” reviewed the effectiveness of the air-based campaigns in achieving military objectives. The paper’s findings were: 1) A clear, unified command structure is essential. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, during “Operation Deny Flight,” a confusing dual-key coordination structure provided inadequate authority and resulted in air forces not being given authority to assist in key situations; 2) To avoid a “perpetual patrol problem,” states must know in advance their policy objectives and the exit strategy for no-fly zones; 3) The effectiveness of no-fly zones is highly dependent on regional support. A lack of support from Turkey for the 1996 Iraq no-fly zone ultimately constrained the coalition’s ability to effectively enforce it.[14]
Libya, 2011[edit]
2011 no-fly zone in Libya
Main article: 2011 military intervention in Libya
As part of the 2011 military intervention in Libya, the United Nations Security Council approved a no-fly zone on 17 March 2011. The resolution includes provisions for further actions to prevent attacks on civilian targets.[15][16] NATO seized the opportunity to take the offensive, bombing Libyan government positions during the civil war. The NATO no fly zone was terminated on 27 October after a unanimous vote by the UNSC.[17]
Libya, 2018 and 2019[edit]
A no-fly zone was declared by the Libyan National Army (LNA) in the country’s south during the LNA’s offensive in the region in 2018.[18] It was later re-implemented for 10 days in 2019 as the LNA established control over oil fields in the region.[19] The LNA declared another no-fly zone in the country’s west, during the 2019 Western Libya offensive.[20]
See also[edit]
Aviation portal
War portal
Air supremacy
List of airliner shootdown incidents
Prohibited airspace
Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses
Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen#Other effects
HEY THERE I’m PENTAREDDY founder and CEO of and I’m excited to see you here!
WELCOME TO PENTAREDDYN.COM I hope you guys enjoyed this post, Let me know in the comments below because I always enjoy hearing from you or simply stop by and say hello!
If you have any questions or suggestions please feel free to reply to this email.
Thank you,
If you enjoyed this post don’t forget to like, follow, share and comment!
all the best!

Read Previous post!
Read Next post!